Patterns Of LLM Weaponization: A Comparative Analysis of Exploitation Incidents Across Commercial AI Systems

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55549/ijasse.50

Keywords:

Large language models, Comparative analysis, Cyber exploitation patterns, LLM weaponization, Autonomous agents, Capability democratization, Underground AI, Defensive frameworks

Abstract

This comparative study examines patterns of Large Language Model (LLM) weaponization through systematic analysis of four major exploitation incidents spanning from 2023-2025. While existing research focuses on isolated incidents or theoretical vulnerabilities, this study provides one of the first comprehensive comparative framework analyzing exploitation patterns across state-sponsored cyber-espionage (Anthropic Claude incident), academic security research (GPT-4 autonomous privilege escalation), social engineering platforms (SpearBot phishing framework), and underground criminal commoditization (WormGPT/FraudGPT ecosystem). Through comparative analysis across eight dimensions, adversary sophistication, target selection, exploitation techniques, autonomy levels, detection evasion, attribution challenges, defensive gaps, and capability democratization, this research identifies critical cross-case patterns informing defensive prioritization. Findings reveal three universal exploitation mechanisms transcending adversary types: autonomous goal decomposition via chain-of-thought reasoning (present in all four cases), dynamic tool invocation and code generation (3/4 cases), and adaptive social engineering (4/4 cases). Analysis demonstrates progressive capability democratization: state-level sophistication (Claude: 80-90% autonomy) transitioning to academic accessibility (GPT-4: 33-83% success rates), specialized criminal tooling (SpearBot: generative-critique architecture), and mass commoditization (WormGPT: $200-1700/year subscriptions). Comparative findings identify four cross-cutting defensive imperatives applicable regardless of adversary type: multi-turn conversational context monitoring, behavioral fingerprinting distinguishing legitimate from malicious complex workflows, federated threat intelligence enabling rapid cross-organizational learning, and capability-based access controls proportional to LLM reasoning sophistication.

Downloads

Published

12/31/2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Patterns Of LLM Weaponization: A Comparative Analysis of Exploitation Incidents Across Commercial AI Systems. (2025). International Journal of Academic Studies in Science and Education, 3(2), 125-146. https://doi.org/10.55549/ijasse.50

Most read articles by the same author(s)